Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP62M 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 148
55% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 322
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 14 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NY 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 122 159 97 88 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 446
Write 372
Mixed 165
SusWrite 128
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 28.2
81% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 308
231% 308 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 129 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 134
Write 111
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 128
72% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 9905700-011.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback