Today's hottest deals

HP 500-133eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-133eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 173
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 281
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 107
Parallax 154
82% 121 fps
MRender 89.5
Gravity 108
Splatting 74.9
73% 90.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 305 344 428 439 436 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 407
Write 20.3
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 353
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 9.5
59% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 16
14% 20 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-133eo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP 500-133eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback