Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 183
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 449
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 39.2
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 28.1
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 352 212 172 171 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 838
Write 415
Mixed 321
SusWrite 264
101% 459 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 30.1
96% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 262
195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
872GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 182 135 171 106 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 255
Write 243
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 157
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.3
279% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 118%
Great: 198%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
242GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 103 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 64
SusWrite 102
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-MEM1600E38GG 0793 W-MEM1600E38GG Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback