Vultr HFC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVultr HFC  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 03:13
Run Duration415 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 17.6
2-Core 0.1
6% 8.85 Pts
4-Core 4
8-Core 1.2
0% 2.6 Pts
64-Core 1.9
0% 1.9 Pts
Poor: 36% Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 305 349 357 291 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 44.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 336
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
4% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 13% Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback