Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12400T 216 User benchmarks, average bench 83% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 82.1 1-Core 170 2-Core 314 101% 189 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 836 88% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730 14,644 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 330B) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 8.1 6% 9.6 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 0.3 4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-256G-1001 256GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 255% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 73102101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,087 Write 1859 Mixed 1,691 488% 2,212 MB/s	4K Read 72.7 4K Write 225 4K Mixed 91.9 347% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 948 DQ Write 1,544 DQ Mixed 877 768% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 364%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 17.4 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.5 8% 8.53 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB 14,450 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Gen Intel Core i5-12400T12thBench 83%, 216 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 730IntelBench 6%, 14,644 samples	3x

SSD
PC SN740 SDDQNQD-256G-1001 256GBWDBench 255%, 246 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $72Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples	1x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP 16GBHynixBench 75%, 40 samples	1x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBCrucialBench 76%, 11 samples	1x