Performance Results

Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop 75%
Workstation 55%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime24.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 102
61% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 338
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 122
Parallax 117
94% 118 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 123
Splatting 109
92% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 317 376 370 431 427 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 222
Write 168
Mixed 246
SusWrite 373
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 25.8
106% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 288
235% 334 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 416 424 427 431 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 351
Write 382
Mixed 319
SusWrite 418
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 33.7
121% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 256
212% 306 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 58%

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $871
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $402
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback