Panasonic CF-31-5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-31-5  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF31-5
Memory12.7 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 03:13
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 116
48% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 166
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 420 424 417 366 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 410
Write 378
Mixed 358
SusWrite 403
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 24.5
73% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 211
171% 239 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 64GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1296 768
Typical CF-31-5 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-31-5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback