Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 04:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 188
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 610
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 125
Parallax 121
109% 127 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 101
Splatting 98.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 322 301 372 364 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 1,660
Mixed 1151
SusWrite 500
266% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 53
178% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 551
421% 578 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 169%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZR F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZR 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 21.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback