Samsung N102SP/N100SP/N101SP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung N102SP/N100SP/N101SP  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NPN100SZ-E02NG
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 08:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 5.3
2-Core 8.2
28% 30.1 Pts
4-Core 8
8-Core 7.8
1% 7.9 Pts
64-Core 8.1
0% 8.1 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 51.9
Mixed 44.3
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.07
22% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1B0873EV 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.34% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.1
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback