Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 54.1 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 74.6 37% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 84.6 8-Core 72 11% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 71.3 4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1672) 1GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.57 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.1 3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ulike 120G 120GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 38 33 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 286 Write 222 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 59.1 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 8.7 35% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 7.4 37% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	53x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-051.A00LF 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 63 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 187 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $160

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16