Today's hottest deals

HP CQ3380D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP CQ3380D  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 16:46
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 159
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 283
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
PowerColor(148C 2356) 2GB
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 33.9
22% 31.1 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 37.7
25% 29.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 18.7
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.18
80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-037.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ3380D Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ3380D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback