Today's hottest deals

Asrock H410M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H410M/ac  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 16:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$69
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 636
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 39.9
28% 37.7 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 32.6
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 512GB SSD
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 42 10 118 18 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 412
Write 296
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 63.1
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 64.9
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 0.5
11% 28 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$55
1TB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 196 197 196 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 122
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 196
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.M16FF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M/ac Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H410M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback