Lenovo 81CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81CC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Cairo 4A
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 14:57
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 24.3
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 140
40% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 191
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39C5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.2
0% 3.4 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 209 211 216 219 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 259
Write 301
Mixed 206
SusWrite 217
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 8.7
32% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 147
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 290
14% 290 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81CC Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback