Dell PowerEdge R410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R410  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 100
41% 69 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 343
34% 280 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 133 57 118 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 61
Write 32.3
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 82.2
11% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 19.9
45% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 101
77% 107 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST250DM001 HD253 250GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 112 112 104 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
Read 101
Write 92.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 111
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 75%
GB1000EAMYC 1TB
414GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 87 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 100
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 93.3
67% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 77 76 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 85
Write 40
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 72.8
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
233GB free
Firmware: CC38
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 120
Mixed 65.8
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
283GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 86 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 72.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 90.4
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 02FE00B302FE EBJ41HE4BDFA-DJ-F 00AD04B380AD HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 00AD04B380AD HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 02FE00B302FE EBJ41HE4BDFA-DJ-F 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R410 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback