HP 810-109

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP 810-109  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory9.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140210
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 21:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 541
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 13.1
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 13
Splatting 10.5
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC8110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 363 323 350 375 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 436
Write 369
Mixed 273
SusWrite 358
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 26.3
91% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 169
160% 249 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
156GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 42 44 46 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 51.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 45
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-109 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: HP 810-109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback