Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 13:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 353
41% 318 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 105
Parallax 72.9
61% 84.3 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 59.3
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37128GJ 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 67 88 70 58 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 467
Write 350
Mixed 339
SusWrite 81.7
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 32.5
130% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 187
167% 248 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3200D F4-3000C16-8GVRB 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.9
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback