Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 08:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 235
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 609
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 82.6
74% 87.3 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 71
69% 87.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 256GB 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 1138 1195 1241 1112 333 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,646
Write 1,213
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 959
271% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 32.8
223% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 368
362% 558 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 218%
Great: 187%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 256GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 300
Mixed 296
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 31.3
119% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 48.9
83% 162 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback