Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 277
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 856
85% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 132E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 46.5
45% 59.9 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 52
Splatting 54.8
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 1668 1765 1804 897 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,560
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 1,329
331% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 67.5
233% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 955
709% 949 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 258%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 17.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback