QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.4 GB free of 13 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon D-1527
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 39
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 95.6
33% 58 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 292
26% 222 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology Storage 129GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 195 292 264 257 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
Read 162
Write 486
Mixed 205
SusWrite 276
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 10.1
35% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 154
106% 133 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback