Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 70
2-Core 136
57% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 315
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 186
Parallax 174
138% 176 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 187
Splatting 127
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 231 12 283 16 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 464
Write 416
Mixed 388
SusWrite 180
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 24.3
99% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 1.1
65% 152 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 102%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
223GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 259 257 257 265 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 344
Write 281
Mixed 263
SusWrite 257
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 28.5
104% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 156
142% 218 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 91%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 233 234 233 236 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 120
SusWrite 232
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 0.2
3% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 45%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: FC01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 219 219 219 217 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 214
Write 200
Mixed 110
SusWrite 217
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 0
47% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 0.3
4% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 45%
SanDisk SDSSDA120G 120GB
102GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 80 49 57 51 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
141% Outstanding
Read 253
Write 226
Mixed 219
SusWrite 67
247% 191 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 11.4
1,400% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 13
1,765% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
22GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 0.1
47% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 50%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 79 49 57 51 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 152
Write 151
Mixed 103
SusWrite 67
154% 118 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 70%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
6GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 8.7 9.3 15 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 12.7
10% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
17GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 34 34 27 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 21
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 30.3
37% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
6% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 41%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
50GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 551
Write 5.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.1
94% 140 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.4
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback