Lenovo 3492A64

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3492A64  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G640-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 112
49% 80 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 118
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.5
4% 2.93 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 2.4
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KSM 512GB SSD 512GB
429GB free
Firmware: V1031C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 200 199 193 193 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 210
Write 189
Mixed 193
SusWrite 192
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 13.9
64% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 31.2
53% 99.7 MB/s
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 54 41 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 96.5
Write 95.9
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 47.1
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
133% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung JICRBOOAN-8G1600PC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3492A64 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3492A64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback