Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 04:35
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 577
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 177F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.7% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 49.5
41% 50.6 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 41
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 872
Write 861
Mixed 676
179% 803 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 1.9
54% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81.8
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 103
69% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 11.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback