Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99H
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 10:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 182
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 714
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (100 fps cap detected)
78.7% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 99.2
Parallax 99
82% 99.7 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 76.6
72% 89.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 1024G 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 378 409 425 422 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 424
Write 457
Mixed 394
SusWrite 414
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 30
105% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 179
147% 205 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback