HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887C
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220705
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 195
58% 109 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 568
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.56.05
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 17
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 17.2
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFK-1BC1AABHA 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSV040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 423 376 639 597 761 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 358
Write 191
Mixed 547
SusWrite 536
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 19.9
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 302
216% 284 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 9.7
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback