Today's hottest deals

Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 22:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G5900-$33
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 210
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 109
20% 140 Pts
64-Core 99.7
6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 9BA8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 114 235 313 140 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 212
Write 204
Mixed 166
SusWrite 170
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 14.8
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 116
93% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 102%
General UDisk 16GB
14GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,528
Mixed 4.2
1,164% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Mixed 0
260% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback