Asrock J4105M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock J4105M  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 41
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 105
38% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 171
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3F86) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.48
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.63 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.9
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 301
Mixed 298
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 19.6
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 175
132% 179 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $32
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback