User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221010
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 01:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 503
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 88.8
79% 94.1 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 75.3
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NX-128 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08381
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 629 353 175 176 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,282
Write 670
Mixed 782
SusWrite 359
171% 773 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 50.9
168% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 318
224% 281 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 138%
Great: 198%
Walram 512G 512GB
307GB free
Firmware: V0523B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1050 1101 1141 892 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,597
Write 1,152
Mixed 955
SusWrite 884
256% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 22.6
118% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 301
232% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 167%
Great: 229%
Xraydisk 480GB SSD 480GB
299GB free
Firmware: HCS2705D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 359 351 389 322 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 416
Write 403
Mixed 356
SusWrite 309
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 10.1
90% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 13
72% 162 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD3200U1808JGRGB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback