Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 04:36
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$210
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 736
70% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,403
87% 1,403 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$395
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 204
Parallax 198
178% 207 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Predator SSD GM7000 1TB
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.A.2.Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3654 1765 1323 1099 1025 1025 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 3,758
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 1,648
545% 2411 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 69
234% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 855
642% 860 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 305%
Great: 612%
HP S700 Pro 1TB
655GB free
Firmware: T0116D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 430
Mixed 411
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 38.4
130% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 283
227% 321 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 109%
HP S650 960GB
854GB free
Firmware: SN8108
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 438
Mixed 412
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 37.5
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 289
213% 280 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
914GB free
Firmware: 42AAT8KA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,370
Write 1,535
Mixed 1,422
323% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66.7
232% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 598
539% 822 MB/s
Poor: 170% Great: 380%
Nvme HP SSD FX900 Pro 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: 3.A.F.A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,903
Write 3,905
Mixed 2,615
705% 3,141 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 102
350% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 923
693% 926 MB/s
Poor: 269% Great: 598%
HP P500 1TB
657GB free, PID 3350
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 41.8
Write 39
Mixed 40.2
52% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 13.4
1,089% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 19.6
DQ Mixed 13
1,158% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 74%
Acer USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 8.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 2
4% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hewlett-Packard 48U57AA# 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 26.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 16,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback