TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire V3-372

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-372  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V3-372
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 18:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6157U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 116
52% 85 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 150
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 49.2%
 Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 97 81 77 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 380
Write 94.5
Mixed 125
SusWrite 91.3
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 16
75% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 86.3
100% 178 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 53.1%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 15.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 64.7%
 Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire V3-372 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-372

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples52x
Core i5-6267UIntelBench 57%, 1,134 samples16x
Core i3-6157UIntelBench 54%, 479 samples14x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples64x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples17x
Iris 550 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 9%, 792 samples11x
SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples12x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples10x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples7x
RAM
ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 5,164 samples8x
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples6x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback