TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 78
32% 53 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 231
22% 180 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 32.4%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 45
Parallax 0.4
0% 15.2 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 0.34%
 Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G-1002 512GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70626000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 392 375 377 383 384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 684
Write 438
Mixed 528
SusWrite 386
114% 509 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 11.4
42% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 29
DQ Mixed 94.7
70% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 68.2%
 Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples150x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples88x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples94x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples64x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 60,311 samples49x
SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples104x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples50x
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G-1002 512GBNvmeBench 206%, 538 samples13x
RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples108x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples38x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GBSamsungBench 69%, 173 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback