Lenovo 82KU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82KU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 39.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
66% 128 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 640
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14.04
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 26.7
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 22
Splatting 20.6
16% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AS262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 413 272 194 222 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 434
Write 556
Mixed 757
SusWrite 274
114% 505 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 15
72% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 353
290% 424 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82KU Builds (Compare 1,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback