Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 72 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 138 53% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 235 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6258) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 38.2 32% 38.7 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 41 Splatting 26.9 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 249 257 259 261 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 399 Write 283 Mixed 239 SusWrite 254 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 20.9 77% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 185 155% 226 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 456GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 122 123 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 54 SusWrite 121 72% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 69%
USB Disk 0GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 7.5 11% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB M391B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB M391B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB M391B5273... 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 22.1 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 8.2 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	499x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373