Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 05:14
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 410
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 89 88 86 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 75
Write 78.4
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 81.8
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUP722020APA330 2TB
163GB free
Firmware: JKAOA36C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 74.4
Write 78.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 67.4
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 71%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
813GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 26.8
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 28.2
41% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback