Acer E5-576G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer E5-576G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Ironman_SK
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 08:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 32.8
1-Core 74
2-Core 94.5
38% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 190
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Acer(1025 121A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 12.3
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 9.2
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 121 15 238 168 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 600
Write 4.3
Mixed 184
SusWrite 162
51% 237 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 132 133 132 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 106
Write 140
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 131
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5-576G Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer E5-576G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback