Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 17:09
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 47.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 222
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 581
64% 504 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 23.2
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 1045 946 857 854 851 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,242
Write 728
Mixed 782
SusWrite 901
204% 913 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 53.9
187% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 406
283% 360 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 178%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 12.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 10.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA Builds (Compare 2,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback