Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8109U 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 140 58% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 213 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2074) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	7.66% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 8.6 Parallax 12.5 9% 10.6 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 0.2 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB 7,443 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 255 178 237 311 322 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 415 Write 283 Mixed 322 SusWrite 243 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 26.7 93% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 151 133% 194 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CM4X4GF2400C16S2 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.3% Outstanding	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 44.3 MC Mixed 37 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	1,622x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	79x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $95Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 5,229 samples	62x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	54x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	35x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $69