Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 113
47% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 168
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 29.4
25% 30.3 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 21.5
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSY 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 300 299 316 322 327 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 330
Write 296
Mixed 285
SusWrite 305
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 20.2
64% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 272
205% 277 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback