HP Config 37b D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Config 37b D  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 21:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 243
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 47.4
43% 51.7 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 48
Splatting 44.7
37% 44.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6
3% 4 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.1
Write 54.5
Mixed 38.9
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
69GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.4
Write 54.8
Mixed 40.3
38% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
55GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 32
Mixed 33.3
61% 61 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
116% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991981 (996981) Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Config 37b D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Config 37b D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback