HP Elite SFF 800 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Elite SFF 800 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 894E
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 01:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 71.6
1-Core 197
2-Core 390
113% 220 Pts
4-Core 765
8-Core 1,312
126% 1,039 Pts
64-Core 2,145
133% 2,145 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 894E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.5
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 12
Splatting 0.1
6% 8.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM951 SAMSUNG 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 291 284 286 291 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 302
Mixed 304
SusWrite 289
99% 453 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 36
168% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 419
366% 564 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 133%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBUA081N 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 41.9
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 25.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite SFF 800 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite SFF 800 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback