MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 30.1
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 153
47% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 380
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 132E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 34.7
24% 31.6 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 37.2
23% 26.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G-1032 512GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 1141 1111 1116 1117 606 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,051
Write 1,051
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 1,024
235% 1043 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 41.4
141% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 424
320% 435 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 168%
Great: 267%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 130 130 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 100
Write 131
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HSE-32G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 4.4
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback