Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 12.9
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 134
36% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 232
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.6
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 7.5
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 173 255 272 283 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 340
Write 306
Mixed 308
SusWrite 259
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 20.3
65% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 191
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 275%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0826
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 27 32 33 35 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 30.7
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 32
44% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 5.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 378
11% 378 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback