Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 06:42
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$253
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 901
90% 733 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 109
Reflection 138
Parallax 171
89% 139 fps
Gravity 134
Splatting 93.2
98% 113 fps
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,471
Write 2194
Mixed 1,548
460% 2,071 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 80.1
267% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1064
769% 993 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$101
398GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 1891 1670 1659 1664 1658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,519
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,882
SusWrite 1,787
478% 2,129 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83
274% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,544
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1,218
927% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 352%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
457GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 478 481 424 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 480
Mixed 462
SusWrite 440
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 51.7
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
279GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 478 481 421 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 459
SusWrite 438
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 50.7
170% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
223GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 304 304 304 305 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 481
Mixed 411
SusWrite 324
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 52.5
173% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: WH08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 111 119 126 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 162
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 120
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
318% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 107%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 134 125 135 130 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64% Good
Read 91.8
Write 145
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 132
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,075
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback