Today's hottest deals

JD JDBook-14i31115G48G512GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJD JDBook-14i31115G48G512GS  (all builds)
MotherboardIP3 TN6
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 122
53% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 164
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 8.6
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 10
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 443 24 542 625 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,479
Write 91.6
Mixed 594
SusWrite 311
134% 619 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 13.2
108% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 20.7
65% 151 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 118%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO480E82-3200E 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JDBook-14i31115G48G512GS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: JD JDBook-14i31115G48G512GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback