Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 23:28
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Memory 12.8
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 103
30% 59 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 157
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E20) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 10.6
5% 8 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KZ256 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 136 120 177 116 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 357
Write 383
Mixed 410
SusWrite 196
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 8.7
49% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 269
194% 254 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 201%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
271GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 128 135 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 101
Write 90.8
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 130
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 378
11% 378 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback