Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 16:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49% Average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 207
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 243
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 12.7
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 13
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3128B-AB1 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 123 130 112 139 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 427
Write 145
Mixed 214
SusWrite 128
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 16
90% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 186
138% 193 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback