Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 44.9 2-Core 65.4 41% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 78.4 8-Core 88.4 11% 83.4 Pts	64-Core 70.1 4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 3000 (PHDGD Omega 5.0) 215 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 908A) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 5.0.64.2016 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 49 49 8.4 32 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 450 Write 353 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 87.7 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 0.6 32% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 32.2 40% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.B346G.C280C 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.3% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	3x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x
HD Graphics 3000 (PHDGD Omega 5.0)IntelBench 2%, 215 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
ST600 240G 240GBThinkplusBench 61%, 4 samples	1x

RAM
Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GBAdataBench 40%, 4 samples	2x
76.B346G.C280C 12GBUnknownBench 38%, 3 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27