Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3400QA_M3400QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3400QA_M3400QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3400QA
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220511
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 11:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 114
41% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 370
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 19C2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.03
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18
Parallax 26.4
15% 21 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 19.6
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1018 1003 987 935 864 842 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,045
Write 947
Mixed 982
SusWrite 942
221% 979 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 36.5
121% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 461
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 343
251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 152%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3400QA_M3400QA Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3400QA_M3400QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback