Today's hottest deals

Infinix INBook X1 Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInfinix INBook X1 Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO EM_IC819_200B_V2.0
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 44.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 182
60% 111 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 376
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 15.6
10% 12.9 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 15.6
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1157 409 320 310 329 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 625
Write 788
Mixed 682
SusWrite 474
145% 642 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 25
86% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 494
361% 482 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 102%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron K4A8G165WB-BCRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3333 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INBook X1 Pro Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Infinix INBook X1 Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback