Monster ABRA A7 V14.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V14.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V14.3
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime4 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 146
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 142
21% 153 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1179) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 109
Parallax 26.6
19% 53 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 0.2
14% 19.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 174 65 388 170 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 1,013
Mixed 877
SusWrite 284
175% 779 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 60.6
230% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 533
DQ Mixed 506
370% 477 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 146%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 33.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V14.3 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Monster ABRA A7 V14.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback