Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81X8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81X8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 19:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold 7505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 174
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 248
36% 262 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 13.7
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 7
9% 11.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0011P6LN Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 247 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 863
Write 409
Mixed 113
SusWrite 90.8
80% 369 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 38.9
143% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 83.4
116% 229 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MJ86H9F-3200 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 14
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81X8 Builds (Compare 1,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81X8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback